Over the past several years scientific publishers—including Nature, Science, PNAS, and of course, PLOS—have adopted policies requiring authors to provide the data underlying their manuscript as part of their journal submission, and to make that data publicly available at publication. These Open Data policies are designed to increase public trust in peer reviewed research, and to support reproducibility by improving data accessibility and clarity.
For reviewers asked to assess data as part of their manuscript evaluation, Open Data policies can add a new layer of complexity. What does an effective data review look like, and what should peer reviewers watch out for? | |
"Numbers are friends for me, more or less." — Wim Klein | |